American Standard Version (1901)
Should not the multitude of words be answered? And should a man full of talk be justified?
84 translations of 93 that include the Old Testament
Should not the multitude of words be answered? And should a man full of talk be justified?
Should not the multitude of words be answered? And should a man full of talk be justified?
pop parai loknawk hae pathim han ai boeh maw? Lokthui thaih kami to a zaehaih thung hoiah loisak han oh maw?
“Ol cungkuem te a doo moenih a? Hlang he a hmuilai ngawn tah tang dae ta.
“Ol cungkuem te a doo moenih a? Hlang he a hmuilai ngawn tah tang dae ta.
Aole anei e pono ke pane aku i na huaolelo he nui la? E hoaponoia anei ke kanaka lehelehe wale?
“Should this stream of words go unanswered and such a speaker be vindicated?
-Atò pesonn p'ap reponn gwo paladò sa a? Pale anpil pa ka bay moun rezon.
[Numquid qui multa loquitur, non et audiet? aut vir verbosus justificabitur?
Are all these words to go unanswered? and is a man seen to be right because he is full of talk?
La multitude des paroles ne recevrait-elle pas de réponse, et un grand parleur serait-il justifié ?
Zdaliž k mnohým slovům nemá odpovědíno býti? Aneb zdali člověk mnohomluvný práv zůstane?
“Mea, wanginna mwet ac topuk kas lusrongten inge? Ya mwet se fin kaskas pusla, na ac oru in pwaye sel?
“Não se deve responder à multidão de palavras? Acaso um homem falador deve ser justificado?
Nu ar trebui să se răspundă mulțimii de cuvinte? Și ar trebui să fie declarat drept un om plin de vorbire?
He that speaks much, should also hear on the other side: or does the fluent speaker think himself to be righteous? blessed is the short-lived offspring of woman.
စကားများ၍ အကျိုးရှိသည်မဟုတ်။ နှုတ်သီး ကောင်းသောသူသည် မိမိအပြစ်နှင့် လွတ်ရမည်လော။
Should not the multitude of words be answered? and should a man of much talk be justified?
Sollte die Menge der Worte nicht beantwortet werden, oder sollte ein Schwätzer recht behalten?
Zou de veelheid der woorden niet beantwoord worden, en zou een klapachtig man recht hebben?
Zo’n praatvaar zou onbeantwoord blijven, Zo’n held met de lippen in het gelijk gesteld;
Non risponderebbesi egli ad un uomo di tante parole? Ed un uomo loquace sarebbe egli per ciò reputato giusto?
Shall not he that speaketh much, hear also? or shall a man full of talk be justified?
Should not the multitude of wordes be answered? or should a great talker be iustified?
Shall not the multitude of words receive an answer? Shall the man of words be justified?
“Skal en Ordgyder ej have Svar, skal en Mundheld vel have Ret?
Shall a multitude of words not be answered? and is it so that a man full of talk shall be deemed in the right?
Should not the multitude of words be answered? And should a man full of talk be accounted right?
Should not the multitude of words be answered? and should a man full of talk be justified?
Should not the multitude of words be answered? and should a man full of talk be justified?
Há chẳng nên đáp lại lời nói nhiều sao? Người già miệng há sẽ được xưng là công bình ư?
Should not the multitude of words be answered? And should a man full of talk be justified?
“ʻIkai ʻoku totonu ke tali ʻae ngaahi lea lahi ni? Pea ʻe fakatonuhiaʻi koe ʻae tangata faʻa lau?
Ne répondra-t-on point à tant de discours, et suffira-t-il d'être un grand parleur pour être justifié?
Ĉu kontraŭ multe da vortoj oni ne povas doni respondon? Kaj ĉu tiu, kiu multe parolas, estas prava?
Cette multitude de paroles ne trouvera-t-elle point de réponse, Et suffira-t-il d’être un discoureur pour avoir raison?
Wenn einer lang geredet, muß er nicht auch hören? Muß denn ein Schwätzer immer recht haben?
He that speaks much, should also hear on the other side: or does the fluent speaker think himself to be righteous? blessed is the short lived offspring of woman.
He that speaks much, should also hear on the other side: or does the fluent speaker think himself to be righteous? blessed is the short lived offspring of woman.
“Should this stream of words go unanswered and such a speaker be vindicated?
Should not the multitude of words be answered? and should a man full of talk be justified?
Should not the multitude of words be answered? and should a man full of talk be justified?
“Cotesta abbondanza di parole rimarrà ella senza risposta? Basterà egli esser loquace per aver ragione?
« La multitude des paroles ne devrait-elle pas recevoir de réponse ? Un beau parleur sera-t-il justifié ?
¿Las muchas palabras no han de tener respuesta? ¿y el hombre parlero será justificado?
“¿Acaso no habrá respuesta para tantas palabras? ¿Crees que por hablar mucho tienes la razón?
“¿No se ha de responder a la verborrea? ¿Y el hombre que tanto habla será por ello justificado?
“Zar na riječi mnoge da se ne odvrati? Zar će se brbljavac još i opravdati?
Zar na mnoge reči nema odgovora? Ili će čovek govorljiv ostati prav?
Soll dem Wortschwalle keine Antwort werden, und der Maulheld Recht behalten?
He that speaks much, should also hear on the other side: Or does the fluent speaker think himself to be righteous? Blessed is the short-lived offspring of woman.
הֲרֹ֣ב דְּ֭בָרִים לֹ֣א יֵעָנֶ֑ה וְאִם־אִ֖ישׁ שְׂפָתַ֣יִם יִצְדָּֽק׃
“Shouldn’t the multitude of words be answered? Should a man full of talk be justified?
“Shouldn’t the multitude of words be answered? Should a man full of talk be justified?
“Shouldn’t the multitude of words be answered? Should a man full of talk be justified?
“Shouldn’t the multitude of words be answered? Should a man full of talk be justified?
“Shouldn’t the multitude of words be answered? Should a man full of talk be justified?
“Shouldn’t the multitude of words be answered? Should a man full of talk be justified?
“Shouldn’t the multitude of words be answered? Should a man full of talk be justified?
“Shouldn’t the multitude of words be answered? Should a man full of talk be justified?
Is a multitude of words not answered? And is a man of lips justified?
ὁ τὰ πολλὰ λέγων, καὶ ἀντακούσεται· ἢ καὶ ὁ εὔλαλος οἴεται εἶναι δίκαιος; εὐλογημένος γεννητὸς γυναικὸς ὀλιγόβιος.
Ὁ τὰ πολλὰ λέγων, καὶ ἀντακούσεται· ἢ καὶ ὁ εὔλαλος οἴεται εἶναι δίκαιος;
„Сэ рэмынэ ачастэ нэвалэ де кувинте фэрэ рэспунс ши сэ крядэ лимбутул кэ аре дрептате?
Чи вже ж на безлїч слів не треба давати одвіту? Чи вже ж говорун мусить бути праведний?
Чи вже ж на безлїч слів не треба давати одвіту? Чи вже ж говорун мусить бути праведний?
Зар на многе речи нема одговора? Или ће човек говорљив остати прав?
разве на множество слов нельзя дать ответа, и разве человек многоречивый прав?
הֲרֹ֣ב דְּ֭בָרִים לֹ֣א יֵעָנֶ֑ה וְאִם־אִ֖ישׁ שְׂפָתַ֣יִם יִצְדָּֽק׃
הרב דברים לא יענה ואם איש שפתים יצדק׃
«أَكَثْرَةُ ٱلْكَلَامِ لَا يُجَاوَبُ، أَمْ رَجُلٌ مِهْذَارٌ يَتَبَرَّرُ؟
«آیابه کثرت سخنان جواب نباید داد و مردپرگو عادل شمرده شود؟
စကား များ ၍ အကျိုးရှိသည်မဟုတ်။ နှုတ်သီး ကောင်းသောသူသည် မိမိအပြစ် နှင့် လွတ်ရမည်လော။
말이 많으니 어찌 대답이 없으랴 입이 부푼 사람이 어찌 의롭다 함을 얻겠느냐 ?
言葉数の多い者が、答えも受けずに済むのか。 口達者な者が正しいとされるのか。
“这么多的话岂不该回答吗? 多嘴多舌的人岂能算为义吗?
这许多的言语岂不该回答吗? 多嘴多舌的人岂可称为义吗?
這許多的言語豈不該回答嗎? 多嘴多舌的人豈可稱為義嗎?
Por acaso a multidão de palavras não seria respondida? E o homem falador teria razão?
CC BY 4.0
Ka kîshi-derha yêhe arhashuzibwa? K’okuderha bwenêne kwo kuyâza?
CC BY 4.0
Soll die Menge der Worte unbeantwortet bleiben und der beredte Mann recht behalten?
CC BY 4.0
¿Todas estas palabras quedan sin respuesta? ¿Un hombre tiene razón porque está lleno de palabras?
CC BY 4.0
¿No habrá respuesta a la abundancia de palabras? ¿Será justificado el que habla mucho?
CC BY 4.0
Should not the multitude of devarim be answered? And should an ish full of talk yitzdak (be justified)?
CC BY 4.0